4 posts tagged “relationships”
I'm surprised that I have never sat through this movie before - it was made in the 80s, it was a Brat Pack film...those two facts alone should have made it something I would have watched a number of times. Somehow though, this one slipped through the net, but tonight I finally got around to seeing it. The plot focuses on a group of college leavers in Washington D.C., who struggle to adjust with life after college. There are seven in the group - Billy (Rob Lowe), a selfish but charming man who shirks his responsibilities to his wife and child; Alec (Judd Nelson), who has a good career and a great girlfriend who he really wants to marry, but he can't stop sleeping around; Lesley (Ally Sheedy), Alec's girlfriend who is struggling with whether or not she should commit to Alec; Kevin (Andrew McCarthy), a writer who harbours a secret desire which he is too afraid to talk about; Wendy (Mare Winningham), probably the nicest of the bunch - she wants independence from her family, and also has an unrequited love for Billy; Kirby (Emilio Estevez), who becomes obsessed with a woman who seems unattainable; and Jules (Demi Moore), a good time girl whose partying seems to be spiralling out of control. As they all struggle with life and adulthood, they all learn a few lessons about themselves and each other.
This is certainly an enjoyable film - as with most 80s movies, there is all the usual nostalgic humour to be found in the fashions and hairstyles of the day, but there are also a few funny moments, and even a couple of touching scenes. However, on the whole, the characters are shallow and self-obsessed, and it was hard to feel much for any of them. Billy and Jules in particular were exasperating!! Andrew McCarthy and Mare Winningham did manage to bring a nice touch to their roles and I did particularly like Kevin and Wendy. Overall though, I suspect this movie was a lot more enjoyable when it could be watched at the time that it was set in.
This is the 36th book I have read this year, and the fourth one in the Inspector Montalbano series.
As with all of the others, I enjoyed it very much, although it does slightly feel like more of the same. The books are pretty formulaic, but that does not in any way detract from the pleasure of reading them.
In this book, Montalbano investigates the violent murder of a beautiful woman. There appear to be many possible suspects for the murder, and as always, Montalbano manages to upset his superiors, his colleagues and even his girlfriend, the long suffering Livia, during the course of his investigations. Things of course, are not what they initially seem, and it is up to Montalbano to find his way through the web of lies, and get to the truth of the matter. In the meantime, there are problems in his personal life, where events do not unfold as Montalbano and Livia had hoped.
All in all, a very good read.
My husband and I have a very big collection of DVDs and I am trying to work my way through them all. I'm sure I will get there, slowly but surely. Tonight, I watched Lantana, an Australian movie, made in 2001.
Lantana is a psychological thriller, but lacks the tension of most films in this genre. It is about four marriages, which are all connected in some way, even though not all the members of the respective marriages realise this. It seems that each marriage has it's secrets and problems, and when a woman goes missing, everyone involved is affected in one way or another. Anthony LaPaglia is the main character in the movie; he plays a police officer named Leon Zat, who is tasked with finding the missing woman. I found him to be an entirely unsympathetic and unlikeable character, although that is not to say that I didn't think the character was well drawn.
This movie is actually less about finding out what happened to the missing woman, and more about exploring the relationships, and what is really going on within them.
The first 45 minutes or so of this film did drag somewhat and I thought I might get bored by it (it seemed little more than a mediocre made-for-television movie), but it did pick up and I found myself really interested in the second half of the movie.
I believe that the title of the movie is a reference to the plant of the same name. There is a hedge of this plant growing outside some of the characters houses - it is a very tangled plant, and my belief is that it represents the tangled relationships of the characters, although I could be entirely wrong about this.
Overall, I would give this film 3 out of 5 - slow start, but did pick up. Excellent acting all round.
The first 45 minutes or so of this film did drag somewhat and I thought I might get bored by it (it seemed little more than a mediocre made-for-television movie), but it did pick up and I found myself really interested in the second half of the movie.
I believe that the title of the movie is a reference to the plant of the same name. There is a hedge of this plant growing outside some of the characters houses - it is a very tangled plant, and my belief is that it represents the tangled relationships of the characters, although I could be entirely wrong about this.
Overall, I would give this film 3 out of 5 - slow start, but did pick up. Excellent acting all round.
Seems like it was movie night tonight!! After watching The Fisher King, I watched Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind. This is a very unusual movie, although not in a bad way. However, it definitely requires concentration from the viewer - no popping out for five minutes to make a coffee; you would probably be completely lost if you did.
Joel and Clementines' relationship has gone wrong, and Joel discovers that Clem has had all of her memories of him erased in a procedure which he has never heard of. Hurt and feeling betrayed, he too decides to undergo the procedure, but as he is doing so, he starts to realise how much Clem really means to him.
This film is difficult to describe, and initially difficult to follow. However, it's definitely one that I would want to watch again, and I suspect that it is the type of film that you always spot something new in, on repeated viewings.
Jim Carrey and Kate Winslet are both terrific. I have always thought that Jim Carrey was a wonderful actor, but I considered Kate Winslet to be pretty over-rated, but there's no doubt that she is superb in this movie.
There were a couple of subplots which felt superfluous, but these did not detract from my overall enjoyment of the film.